Talk:Rutherford Institute

From dKosopedia

"wingnut" and "creepier" are inflammatory. "Conservartives might decry legal activism by judges but they are more than willing to exploit every opportunity to use the law to attack the social justice and environmental movements" is editorializing. Neither has a place in this article. --Centerfielder 11:11, 15 June 2006 (PDT)

Editorializing has no place on DKosopedia. OH PLEASE!. If the goal here is to have a NPOV then lets fold up this little tiny tent with its 5 human contributors and 47 sock puppets and merge with Wikipedia.

And NO I don't know why you banned me. You need to explain decisions like that because neither of us is a telepath. There is a nice adjective for decisions without explanations: arbitrary.