Main Page | Recent changes | View source | Page history

Printable version | Disclaimers | Privacy policy

Not logged in
Log in | Help
 

House Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health

From dKosopedia

House Committee on Natural Resources
House Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health
Members, 109th Congress
Democrats: Republicans:

The House Subcommittee on Forests and Forest health has a lot on its plate!

The following link will take you to the GovTrack page of bills and resolutions that are in committee for Resources/Forests and Forest Health. It appears that there are close to 100 bills and resolutions assigned to this committee. If you go to the GovTrack page, you are able to read the bills and resolutions assigned to this committee. My thanks to GovTrack for making their material available! This page is a work in progress and will flesh out as I develop contacts and read the bills and resolutions.


For those who don't want to read the bills but would like an overview, here is the list:

Other Bills in This Congress Associated with This Committee

News

Forest Service Regulation Violates the People's Right to Know - Press Release from Chairman-elect Nick Rahall, dated Decemeber 12, 2006:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The people’s right to know about their government’s plans for National Forest lands is getting the axe, thanks to a new regulation issued today by the U.S. Forest Service, said Rep. Nick J. Rahall (D-WV), Chairman-elect of the House Committee on Resources.

“Changes in fundamental forest policy should be made with the cautious precision of a whittling knife. Instead, the Forest Service is slashing forest laws with a high-powered chain saw,” Rahall said. “This new regulation is just the latest action.”

The Forest Service issued a final rule today that will categorically exclude forest management plans from the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) if they are updated or fundamentally altered.

Under NEPA, public involvement and environmental analyses are required whenever the Forest Service undertakes changes to forest management plans – a process that occurs for each U.S. Forest every 15 years. However, under this new rule, any update, or significant change, would not be subject to NEPA review.

“The result of this new regulation is that the people will have even less ability to know about, let alone weigh in on, management of their U.S. Forest lands,” explained Rahall.

Proponents of the new rule argue that development of management plans must be streamlined and that NEPA reviews would be better conducted on individual projects. But Rahall, along with other Members of Congress, including Rep. Tom Udall (D-NM), has objected to this proposal, noting that excluding forest management plans from NEPA would result in an inability to evaluate cumulative effects on evolving land management decisions.

Additionally, given recent history, it is highly unlikely that individual projects would undergo NEPA review. A recent GAO report found that almost 72 percent of vegetation management projects were approved using categorical exclusions – thus exempted from NEPA. This means that the public was cut out of having a say in almost three quarters of major federal actions affecting our nation’s forests.

“Issuance of this regulation proves, once again, that the Forest Service does not care one whit about the opinions and desires of the American people,” stated Rahall.

“For six years, the administration has been chopping away at the basic tenants of the National Forest Management Act – sound and sustainable forest planning,” he added.

Since 2000, the U.S. Forest Service has eroded balanced forest planning through regulations passed without proper public input. This includes eliminating the ability of the public to appeal illegal logging, doing away with consulting federal wildlife officials to protect endangered species, wiping out wildlife and watershed protections, and undermining science by abolishing scientific review.

“As if that weren’t enough, they now seek to limit the right of the public to know about, and have a say in, how their forest heritage is managed,” argued Rahall.

“The Forest Service should be taken to the woodshed,” he concluded.


House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittees:

Office of Native American & Insular AffairsEnergy & Mineral ResourcesFisheries, Wildlife & OceansNational Parks, Forests & Public LandsWater & Power

Congressional Committees Project : Current United States Congressional committees

House Committees: AgricultureAppropriationsArmed ServicesBudgetEducation and LaborEnergy and CommerceFinancial ServicesForeign AffairsHomeland SecurityAdministrationHurricane KatrinaIntelligenceJudiciaryNatural ResourcesOversight & Government ReformRulesScience & TechnologySmall BusinessStandards of Official ConductTransportation and InfrastructureVeterans' AffairsWays and MeansHouse Subcommittees

Senate Committees: AgingAgriculture, Nutrition & ForestryAppropriationsArmed ServicesBanking, Housing, & Urban AffairsBudgetCommerce, Science & TransportationEnergy & Natural ResourcesEthicsEnvironment & Public WorksFinanceForeign RelationsHealth, Education, Labor, & PensionsHomeland Security & Governmental AffairsIndian AffairsIntelligenceJudiciaryRules & AdministrationSmall Business & EntrepreneurshipVeterans' AffairsSenate Subcommittees

Joint Committees: ConferenceEconomicLibraryPrintingTaxation

Retrieved from "http://localhost../../../h/o/u/House_Subcommittee_on_Forests_and_Forest_Health_2587.html"

This page was last modified 00:20, 2 January 2007 by Lisa Mayo. Based on work by simonf@simonf.com and dKosopedia user(s) Abou Ben Adhem and Dangangry. Content is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.


[Main Page]
Daily Kos
DailyKos FAQ

View source
Discuss this page
Page history
What links here
Related changes

Special pages
Bug reports