Talk:Canada (Republican view)

From dKosopedia

There are many agreeable and true statements about Canada here. Accordingly it is probably more of a "troll view" than a "Republican view". Perhaps we need three articles, devoted to:

1. the Democratic "blue state, we want to be just like Canada, maybe we should join Canada" view, as in Canada

2. the Republican "red state, Canada is what's left of the Soviet Empire, I wonk't go there without my guns" view, as in Canada (Republican view)

3. random or true comments about bad music, absurd whining, idiotic cultural schizophrenia, outright false beliefs common among Canadians, and so on, in Canada (troll view).

4. if more variety is required then something like Canada (socialist view), Canada (Marxist view), Canada (Green view), Canada (Libertarian view) could be created too. Basically, a different article for each political POV as recognized by some neutral source like the wikipedia category of political ideology entry points which even has some color coding.

Oh, and if that's valid, then articles on ideology and coercion might be required up front. Perhaps just nab 'em from Wikipedia and make them more specific to US politics?

"In the Urban Dictionary, about 99% of the definitions of "Canada" written by Canadians focus entirely on this inferiority complex. The other one percent focuses on beer and strippers from Montreal."

This is true. However since every Canadian I ever met was in the one percent group, perhaps I should not comment any further, as I'm not representative.

This article isn't necessarily written by a Republican, but someone disgusted with what he sees as an air of superiority from Canadians. Many Americans do feel this way, not just Republicans. If you actually bothered to read the full article, he claims he wants to deport the Bushes when he mentions the different provinces that have secession groups. And then he later says this:

"These blind assholes who think that being against Bush is the same thing as being for terrorists and that being against the war in Iraq is the same thing as being for Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. The fact that the news media lumps the war in Iraq together with the "War on Terror" (an absurd concept all by itself not to mention that the two are completely mutually exclusive) should be the biggest eye-opener ever for those idiots who for some fabricated reason think the media is liberal. Just because Dick Cheney says 9/11 was connected to Iraq doesn't mean it's true, especially when overwhelming evidence points to the completely opposite conclustion. The media is liberal? Since when? For every one liberal pundit you can name on talk radio or tv, I'll name three conservatives, and most of the right wingers I name will be touted by their host stations as being fair and unbiased. Bill O'Rielley's NO SPIN zone? HAHAHAHAH ! That's a good one! He has the BALLS to say "No Spin" when everything that comes out of his mouth has a steep right wing slant. How is he the "No Spin" guy when he defends every single one of the President's idiotic policies and actions tooth and nail while slamming anyone who DARES to criticize him? That's what "spin" is, ASSHOLE. His whole show is him trying to indoctrinate people with his opinion rather than give them every angle of an argument. He lets guests he agrees with rattle on incessantly, while guests he disagrees with get interrupted every five seconds, get intentionally cut off by commercial breaks, and literally get told to shut up as their microphones get turned off. Scarborough Country? Boy, I'm fucking glad I don't live there!"

I'd find a better example of a "Republican view of Canada," because this one's not cuttin' it.

Proof:

http://www.negativepositive.org/fuck-canada.html http://www.negativepositive.org/Things-that-need-to-die.html